RPE and its relationship with the risk of injury in footballers
Overtime, the competitive distance among elite football teams has shortened, so the focus is currently on those aspects that can tip the scale to one side or the other.
A training programme planning includes the handling of variables such as exercise selection, training volume and intensity, movement speed, rest interval or the duration of a repetition. Sometimes, in spite of not receiving the necessary attention, the duration of a repetition –defined as the time taken to perform the concentric and eccentric muscle action during a repetition– is a very important concept within strength training. It is usually expressed in a sequence of three digits; the first number represents time (in seconds) taken to complete the concentric action, the second number represents the isometric transition phase between the concentric and the eccentric action, and the third number represents the time invested in completing the eccentric action. For example, a 2–0–2 tempo points out that the concentric action is performed in 2 seconds, with no isometric pause and then 2 seconds again for the eccentric phase. Therefore, in this case, the repetition would last 4 seconds. In other cases, we can find it represented in a sequence of 4 digits; the fourth number would represent the isometric or transition phase between the end of the eccentric phase and the beginning of the concentric phase. Thus, following the previous example, in a 2–0–2–1 tempo, number 1 would represent the final phase of the complete movement, and in this case, the repetition lasts 5 seconds.
Up to a certain point, the repetition duration will depend on the load intensity. Great effort is required to move heavy loads in a concentric way, and therefore, the lifting speed will be relatively slow. Speed during the concentric phase will gradually reduce as we get close to muscle failure. As an example, in an interesting research performed in the 1990s, Mookerjee y Ratamess1 observed that trained men completed the concentric movement of the first 5 MR repetition on a bench press in 1.2 seconds, while the fourth and fifth repetitions took them 2.5 and 3.3 seconds, trying to perform the movement as fast as they could in all the repetitions.
Suggestions about the speed at which a repetition for muscle hypertrophy should be performed are very different. While some authors advocate explosive movements, others prefer slow movements, mainly affecting the eccentric phase. With the aim of providing more information for this matter, Brad Schoenfeld, an expert regarding strength training and hypertrophy, performed a meta-analysis with the objective to determine if the variation in the repetition duration could affect muscle growth.2 According to the results of the study published in Sports Medicine, the optimum interval for a repetition to increase muscle mass, should be between 0.5 and 8 seconds. This interval suggests that there is a wide range in which muscle mass can be increased. However, the authors did not mention the duration of the different movement phases (for example, eccentric versus concentric), which makes it difficult to draw a definite conclusion.2
Similarly to the results obtained by Schoenfeld et al., in a study published in The Journal of Physiology, the experts Robert Morton and Stuart Phillips did not observe any differences in the activation of muscle fibres type I and II and subsequent anabolic response in a group of well-trained young individuals who performed a protocol until muscle failure with different intensities (80% of 1 MR versus 30% of 1 MR) and repetition durations (1–1–1 versus 3–1–3).3 Therefore, regardless of the intensity, for total durations between 3 and 7 seconds per repetition (remember that the interval proposed by Schoenfeld went from 0.5 to 8 seconds) the strength training seems to produce the same effect on muscle mass.3
There seems to be a threshold in 10 seconds (i.e. very slow repetitions) above which the stimulus of muscle mass increase would diminish.2 In another paper, it was observed that for the same total workload, a group that took 4 seconds per repetition (2 seconds for the concentric phase and 2 for the eccentric phase) the cross-sectional area of the muscle increased by 39% compared to only 11% in the group that performed very slow repetitions (14 seconds in total, 10 for the concentric phase and 4 for the eccentric phase).4 In other words, despite the time under tension, was three times longer in the group that performed super slow repetitions, the benefits of muscle mass increase, were almost four times less.4
Although in this regard evidence is still inconclusive, at least it does suggest that the repetition duration can cover a wide range when the main objective is to increase muscle mass. Fitness coaches should always respect and consider training personalization given the variability of responses by different subjects.
Javier S. Morales
Mental abilities, although not yet fully appreciated, are already considered a relevant part of performance. But their importance could go beyond that: Do they also influence the injury risk, including recurrence, once the player returns to play?
Although several studies have tried to evaluate the characteristics of the risk of injury in handball players, they have been unable to reach sufficiently reliable conclusions. A new study of all the FC Barcelona handball categories has attempted to shed more light on the subject.
Although there are several studies on this topic, many of them have analyzed these demands by looking at just a few variables or using very broad timeframes. A new study completed by physical trainers from F.C. Barcelona has analyzed several of these details more closely.
An article published in The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine —in which members of the club’s medical services participated— now suggests to consider the detailed structure of the area affected, and treating the extracellular matrix as an essential player in the prognosis of the injury.
In this article, Tim Gabbett and his team provide a user-friendly guide for practitioners when describing the general purpose of load management to coaches.
For the first time, it has been demonstrated that it does not take months of training to significantly improve both muscle volume and strength; instead, two weeks of an appropriate exercise are enough.
Training using eccentric exercises is important to prevent possible damage. However, intensive training can also cause muscle damage, so it is critical to be vigilant in order to keep injury risk to an absolute minimum.
Cardiovascular endurance manifests as a moderator of the load result to which the athlete is exposed.
Through the use of computer vision we can identify some shortcomings in the body orientation of players in different game situations.